Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | LPisGood's commentslogin

What about the style are you bothered by? The content seems to be nothing new, so maybe that is the issue, but the style itself seems fine, no?

It bears all the hallmarks of AI writing: length, repetition, lack of structure, and silly metaphors.

Nothing about this story is complex or interesting enough to require 1000 words to express.


Correct form and relevant citations have been, for generations up to a couple of years ago, mighty strong signals that a work is good and done by a serious and reliable author. This is no longer the case and we are worse off for it.

This basically just the ethical framework philosophers call Contractarianism. One version says that an action is morally permissible if it is in your rational self interest from behind the “veil of ignorance” (you don’t know if you are the actor or the actee)

This is why I like using mathematical or algorithmic approaches to solve difficult problems. Writing programs that use statistics, mathematics, optimization, analytical geometry, etc guarantee a certain level of security from the swarms of CRUD merchants flooding the market.

I think it’s a pretty easy principle that machines are not people and people learning should be treated differently than machines learning


You see this principle in privacy laws too.

I can be in a room looking at something with my eyeballs and listening with my ears perfectly legally... But it would not be legal if I replaced myself with a humanoid mannequin with a video camera for a head.


You can even write down what you are looking at and listening to, although in some cases, dissemination of, e.g. verbatim copies in your writing could be considered copying.

But it is automatically copying if you use a copier.


Yes, I remember a friend that interned there a couple times showed me that. One of them was “list comprehensive python” and the Google website would split in 2 and give you some really fun coding challenges. I did a few, and you get 4(?) right you get a guaranteed interview I think. I intended to come back and spend a lot of time on an additional one, but I never did. Oops


I think I only did three or something and I didn't hear back from them. Honestly my view of Google is that they aren't as cool as they think they are. My current position allows me to slack off as much as I want and it's hard to beat that, even if they offer more money (they won't in the current market).


Chase Sapphire Preferred is less than 100 per year and it has those things.


Realistically if the biggest problem is couple’s divorcing to get a second home, then the problem has been pretty well attacked


I disagree with this logic. To take it to an extreme, if one person earning a million dollars per minute has moral value X, then a million people earning one dollar per minute has moral value X. I disagree on principle.


I’m confused. Claude is a few years old.


The parent comment specifically referenced Claude Code, which launched in Feb 2025 [1] and went GA May 2025 [2]. Codex also launched May 2025 [3].

[1] https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-7-sonnet

[2] https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-4

[3] https://openai.com/index/introducing-codex/


but not Claude Code. it was released just this summer (I guess?)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: